
China’s high-speed rail (HSR) network is nothing short of an engineering marvel. Spanning over 45,000 kilometres, connecting 33 of the country’s 34 provincial-level administrative divisions, it has revolutionised travel, cutting hours off journeys and bringing distant regions into China’s economic orbit. But while benefits are undeniable, the massive costs and sustainability concerns leave room for debate.
The HSR has reshaped the country’s economic landscape in just under two decades. By linking major cities and smaller, previously isolated towns, it has spurred regional development, and boosted tourism. Cities like Chengdu in Sichuan province, which were once considered remote, have seen increased investment and business activity simply because they’re now easier to reach.
On the flip side, the financial burden is enormous. The China State Railway Group’s debt stood at roughly $860 billion as of late 2024, fuelled by relentless expansion. Some routes remain underutilised (long distance trips connecting Beijing to the capitals of Tibet and Xinjiang, Lhasa and Urumqi respectively), and critics argue that resources could have been allocated more efficiently. Some lines were built with overly ambitious passenger forecasts, leading to stations that sit largely empty (referred to as ‘ghost stations’). The question remains: is China building too much, too fast?
China isn’t just expanding its network; it’s also pushing the limits of speed. Last month, the country unveiled the CR450, a next-generation bullet train designed to cruise at 400km/h (248mph). During tests, it hit an astonishing 453km/h (281 mph), setting a new record for conventional high-speed rail. This is a big leap forward in rail technology and signals China’s intent to maintain its dominance in the sector.
As China continues to expand and refine its network, the world is watching, eager to see if this model of aggressive infrastructure investment will pay off in the long run.
To receive more stories like this right in your inbox every week, subscribe below:
Comments